Is Tresora a treasury management system?

A TMS is one of the modules, not the product. Cash positioning, forecasting and payments are modules; underneath them is one reconciled financial reality for the whole group that every module reads from. That is why adding the next module is a configuration, not another integration project.

Can it replace our treasury spreadsheets?

Yes. The workbook exists to reconcile tools that do not reconcile themselves — bank against ledger, entity against entity. Tresora does that reconciliation first, so the figure the spreadsheet was maintaining by hand is produced and evidenced by the system.

Why not just use our bank portals?

A bank portal shows you one bank’s balances. It cannot tie them to your ledger, net the intercompany legs, or reconcile them against what you expected — so the moment you hold more than one banking relationship, the portals become one more source to reconcile rather than the answer.

How is this different from a TMS that already does reporting?

Reporting is the last step, not the foundation. A system that reports a number it never reconciled is reporting a guess with a border around it. Tresora reconciles bank against ledger to the cent first, then reports the figure that survived it, traceable to the record it came from.

It instructs your banks on your behalf, and nothing moves that you did not authorize. The funds stay in your own accounts, and every payment follows the approval path you require.

Treasury without the stack

The alternative to a legacy TMS is one reconciled reality.

A stack of bank portals shows you balances. A wall of spreadsheets ties them together by hand. A TMS reports the result and reconciles none of it. Tresora reconciles bank against ledger first, and every module reads the one figure that survived it.

Request a demo

One account, one Monday morning

What the bank portal exports: EUR 4,812,400
What the ledger and the report say: EUR 4,796,150

Unexplained difference

EUR 16,250

The same account sits in three tools. Each is certain. None of them agrees.

The cost of the stack

Why doesn’t the same number match across your tools?

Because nothing reconciles them. Each tool is its own source of truth, so the group keeps three answers to one question and pays someone to reconcile them by hand every close.

Three sources, one question: The bank portal, the ledger and the report each hold a balance. Which one funds tomorrow is a judgment call, made under time pressure, by whoever knows the workbook.
Reconciliation by email: The break between bank and ledger is chased in a thread, not resolved by a system. The evidence lives in someone’s inbox and leaves when they do.
A figure nobody can defend upward: A number assembled by hand cannot be traced to the record it came from. When an auditor asks, the answer is a spreadsheet, not a source.

None of this is a tooling gap. It is the absence of one reconciled reality underneath the tools.

One reconciled reality

What changes when bank and ledger agree first?

Everything downstream reads one figure instead of three. The position, the forecast and the report are the same reconciled number, cut to whichever level you are answering for.

It reconciles: Bank against ledger, both legs of every intercompany movement, at group scale. The difference is taken apart into named items that add back to it exactly — or it is left unexplained, on the surface, rather than smoothed away.
It reports to the cent: Every figure traces to the record it came from, so a number a treasurer sends upward is one an auditor can reproduce from source. The engine keeps the evidence, the alternatives it rejected and their scores, and the whole trail exports.
It builds the live statement on top: The statement recomputes as transactions categorize, so it is never an export that went stale the moment it was saved, and any line on it opens onto the reconciled movements underneath. It consolidates across entities, currencies and calendars from that same figure — not a second computation that drifts from it.

Reconciliation · case 4471QX

Difference, bank to ledger

EUR 16,250

The gap between the two balances, taken apart below

Receipts credited by the bank, not yet postedClears itselfEUR +21,480
Payments posted in the ledger, not yet debitedClears itselfEUR +7,140
A card settlement received net, posted grossNeeds an entryEUR -15,130
One supplier payment posted twiceNeeds an entryEUR +2,760

Left unexplainedEUR 0

The card settlement and the duplicate posting are the two that need an entry; the two timing items clear on tomorrow’s statement.

The reconciliation does not just tidy the books. It is the one figure every other screen is built on.

What you stop doing

What does one reconciled reality let you retire?

The workbook only one person can update. The reconciliation that happens in an inbox. The monthly scramble to make three tools agree.

The reconciliation workbook: The figure it maintained by hand is produced and evidenced by the system. The workbook existed to reconcile tools that never reconciled themselves.
The version only one person can update: The reconciled reality is a system of record, not a file passed around. Nobody has to be at their desk for the group to know its position.
The report you cannot trace to source: Every figure carries the record behind it, so the answer to “where did this come from” is a link, not a reconstruction.

Automation follows the rule you wrote. Intelligence tells you the rule was wrong. A system that only applies your matching rules cannot notice when a payment settled net, a supplier was paid twice, or a counterparty is not who the reference says. The engine weighs the competing explanations, scores them, and keeps the ones it rejected.

The modules that read from it

Who it fits

Who is treasury without spreadsheets built for?

There is no floor here and no ceiling. One company in one country and a group with subsidiaries on three continents differ in scale, not in kind — the same question has to be answered once, at every level, from the same reconciled figure.

Legal entities: Each books in its own ledger, so the same movement has two legs the moment it crosses a border inside the group.
Banking relationships: Every bank sends a different file in a different format, and a balance is only as current as the last one that reported.
Currencies: A group position is a translation, and it needs one published rate per pair at the moment the position was read. Every movement inside it carries the rate on the day that cash actually moved, never a month-end average applied backward.
Calendars: Value dates, settlement cycles and local holidays mean “today’s cash” means something different in each country, and the position has to reconcile them.

It fits the groups where this is hardest — hotel and hospitality operators, retail and franchise networks, multi-country manufacturers, and any holding structure whose entities bank in more than one place.

Written for the people who answer for the figure

Questions

Choosing the alternative

01Is Tresora a treasury management system?: A TMS is one of the modules, not the product. Cash positioning, forecasting and payments are modules; underneath them is one reconciled financial reality for the whole group that every module reads from. That is why adding the next module is a configuration, not another integration project.
02Can it replace our treasury spreadsheets?: Yes. The workbook exists to reconcile tools that do not reconcile themselves — bank against ledger, entity against entity. Tresora does that reconciliation first, so the figure the spreadsheet was maintaining by hand is produced and evidenced by the system.
03Why not just use our bank portals?: A bank portal shows you one bank’s balances. It cannot tie them to your ledger, net the intercompany legs, or reconcile them against what you expected — so the moment you hold more than one banking relationship, the portals become one more source to reconcile rather than the answer.
04How is this different from a TMS that already does reporting?: Reporting is the last step, not the foundation. A system that reports a number it never reconciled is reporting a guess with a border around it. Tresora reconciles bank against ledger to the cent first, then reports the figure that survived it, traceable to the record it came from.
05Does it move money?: It instructs your banks on your behalf, and nothing moves that you did not authorize. The funds stay in your own accounts, and every payment follows the approval path you require.

See one reconciled reality on your own group.

Bring one entity’s bank files and its ledger. We reconcile them to the cent and show you the figure that survives.

Request a demo See the whole product

Nothing moves that you did not authorize, and the funds stay in your own accounts.